EU AI Act Compliance
In-depth analysis and practical guides on EU AI Act compliance. Written by Nevant Global's engagement team.
In-depth analysis of EU AI Act obligations. Written by Nevant Global's engagement team — not AI-generated, not generic.
AI that filters, ranks, or shortlists candidates is explicitly high-risk. What that classification triggers, who it applies to, and what deployers must document.
Read article →Deploying or changing AI that affects working conditions triggers WOR consultation and AI Act obligations simultaneously. The documentation overlaps — but only if it is structured correctly.
Read article →The Platform Work Directive introduces transparency and contestability obligations for algorithmic management that run parallel to the AI Act's oversight requirements. How they interact in practice.
Read article →AI used in creditworthiness assessment is high-risk under Annex III Section 5a. What that means for financial institutions and fintech operators using automated scoring models.
Read article →Article 14 requires effective human oversight of high-risk AI — and documented evidence of it. What oversight design must include, what training records must show, and what intervention logs must contain.
Read article →EU companies with US operations and US companies serving EU markets face overlapping obligations under the AI Act, Colorado SB 205, NYC Local Law 144, and Illinois BIPA. How to build one program that covers both.
Read article →